CASE STUDY

Community-Based
Restorative Justice

LOCATION

New York City

ISSUE

Advancing Justice

ACTIVE

2024-present


As part of the plan to safely shift New York City away from reliance on jails and toward a more equitable system, CUNY ISLG is partnering with the Mayor’s Office of Criminal Justice to create the Community-Based Restorative Justice Initiative, funding grassroots organizations to incorporate restorative justice principles into their programming.  


Challenge:

From within statehouses to nonprofit organizations to kitchen tables, there is growing recognition across the country that a criminal legal system that prioritizes punishment is not the answer to long-term community safety. Data shows, in fact, that incarceration can increase likelihood of future crimes. Momentum for a more holistic, community-based approach to resolving conflict that addresses the root causes of crime is growing in its place.  

Restorative justice (RJ) is a method of addressing harm that centers accountability; it engages both the person who perpetrated the harm as well as care and reparations to the person harmed by it. By bringing the two parties together with trained practitioners, this approach seeks to heal the survivor’s wounds while also taking the reparative actions necessary to prevent future harms. RJ can also be done proactively to prevent crime, build community, and strengthen dialogue around topics concerning the community. 

However, organizations often face challenges to implementing these programs. Small and grassroots organizations often struggle with insufficient funding, staffing, and time to properly train and implement restorative justice practices. Many rely on short-term grants, making it difficult to maintain programs over time. Tensions between “tough on crime” policies and RJ also complicate implementation: while RJ focuses on healing, accountability, and community restoration, tough-on-crime policies prioritize punishment and deterrence. This ideological conflict can create public perception challenges, with RJ being inaccurately seen as “soft” on crime.

In reality, it’s not an either/or, but a depends: RJ is not one-size-fits all. It is not suitable for all types of crime or every situation, and is less effective in cases involving power imbalances, safety concerns, or a lack of community support. Its effectiveness depends on the readiness of those involved—both the person harmed and the person who caused harm—to participate in open, honest dialogue and healing processes. It requires careful assessment and preparation to determine when and if RJ is appropriate, as well as trained professionals to administer it. 

Approach:

Following New York City’s announcement of its plan to close the jails on Rikers Island, the De Blasio mayoral administration worked with the City Council to engage community stakeholders in the creation of a better, more equitable system, and solicited ideas for potential investments to make it happen. One of these investments was for a Community-Based Restorative Justice  (CBRJ) Initiative.  

An Advisory Committee, in collaboration with the Restorative Justice Initiative, released a report for city agencies and the City Council. The report outlines recommendations to help organizations strengthen or implement RJ services and activities. The primary focus was investing in small and grassroots organizations that have historically faced barriers to accessing public funding, as well as supporting specific neighborhoods disproportionately impacted by a lack of resources and high incarceration rates. Funding would go to starting or strengthening RJ practices within their services, as well as building overall organizational capacity.

Funding would go to starting or strengthening RJ practices within their services, as well as building overall organizational capacity.

The report emphasized that the procurement process should have a participatory grantmaking approach, meaning that those closest to impacted communities play a key role in decision-making during the procurement process. With this report in mind, MOCJ then engaged ISLG to implement the solicitation, as well as to support grantees in developing their capacity by offering operational, strategic, and programmatic training and technical assistance. 

Read more about the RFP process in “Rethinking RFPs and Grant Management for Real Impact” on our blog.

Progress:

In July 2024, through the solicitation process, CUNY ISLG, selected 16 grantees. The recipients’ RJ proposals were broken into three broad categories: community-based programming, training and technical assistance, and fellowships. Grant winners include established organizations, such as the East Harlem-based alternative-to-incarceration program Getting Out And Staying Out (GOSO), along with newly established ones, including Mazorca Colectiva, which draws on ancestral practices to provide grassroots community healing in Queens. 

These grantees embarked on a 12-month planning and implementation process. Each program is receiving up to $300,000, based on the size and scale of their program, with additional funding available to support an extension of the implementation period. Stay tuned for updates this June on what these grantees accomplished and what’s next. 

Contact Nathalie Lebrón, at Nathalie.Lebron@islg.cuny.edu for more information.   

Project Updates